Sunday, May 30, 2010

The heck with it, I'm yielding the floor to the L.A. Times

The L.A. Times editors sum up something about the education problem that I would have taken a lot longer to say. They have gone public with the opinion that complex problems in a complex system may have more than two "sides" and may not be susceptible to simple, one-shot solutions. How dare they.

No magic bullet for education
America keeps looking for one simple solution for its education shortcomings. There isn't one.
May 30, 2010

The "unschooling" movement of the 1970s featured open classrooms, in which children studied what they were most interested in, when they felt ready. That was followed by today's back-to-basics, early-start model, in which students complete math worksheets in kindergarten and are supposed to take algebra by eighth grade at the latest. Under the "whole language" philosophy of the 1980s, children were expected to learn to read by having books read to them. By the late 1990s, reading lessons were dominated by phonics, with little time spent on the joys of what reading is all about — unlocking the world of stories and information.

A little more than a decade ago, educators bore no responsibility for their students' failure; it was considered the fault of the students, their parents and unequal social circumstances. Now schools are held liable for whether students learn, regardless of the students' lack of effort or previous preparation, and are held solely accountable for reaching unrealistic goals of achievement.

No wonder schools have a chronic case of educational whiplash. If there's a single aspect of schooling that ought to end, it's the decades of abrupt and destructive swings from one extreme to another. There is no magic in the magic-bullet approach to learning. Charters are neither evil nor saviors; they can be a useful complement to public schools, but they have not blazed a sure-fire path to student achievement. Decreeing that all students will be proficient in math and reading by 2014 hasn't moved us dramatically closer to the mark...

Go ahead, read the whole thing and tell me where they're wrong.

No comments: